Better business for a better new york

Special Announcement - July 2010

The case has been adjourned until August 4th at 9:00 am. The case is still being heard by Judge Arcara at the federal building in Buffalo NY Please keep posted to this site for further information.

Special Announcement - June 2010

We are please to inform you that we are scheduled to appear in US Federal Court in Buffalo NY on July 21, 2010 at 9:00 am. I am asking everyone that can possible make it to attend. As usual the state has file a motion to dismiss whereas we simply want discovery. While the arguments for the state are more procedural, I have been granted by the court the opportunity to argue the case pro se along with our attorney Hugh Russ. Shortly I will have the briefs on the site for your view.

Special Announcement - February 2010

Some new development and news that I thought everyone would be interested in.First I received notice from our attorney Hugh Russ that the Ironworkers Union in New York State is planning to file an amicus brief in opposition to our suit. Obviously the Law Journals across the state had an article in about the second suit that apparently has the state worried. Albeit, my response is simple, the US Constitution, 14th amendment provides every American citizen the right to due process: Labor Law 240 denies that constitutional right. I do not deny their 1st amendment right to free speech, therefore we welcome their amicus brief as to why contractors in New York State should be denied the right to due process in 240 proceedings.

I would like to inform everyone that a group of contractors that do primarily public contracts with municipalities has sued the state claiming that the Wicks Law is unconstitutional the case will be heard today in State Supreme Court, Buffalo NY. One of the founders of the group is Carl Paladino a developer and activist for "sane" government which as we know does not exist in New York State is running for Governor. I know Carl and was a part of the original group that formed in opposition of the Wicks Law. Although I do not engage in public bidding, I was interested on how they would approach their suit and offered information on our suit against the state.

It is really unfortunate that as businessmen and women we have to take time out of our busy schedule and police our elected officials. Remember, we are the ones that create jobs not the government! Government is there to facilitate our efforts lately, all branches of our government seem to have had a revelation that they can create jobs using our money, while at the same time not taking responsibility for their action. How many of you would like to make major business decisions with someone else's money? If you have no skin in the game what do you have to lose? Job creation starts with you and I we are the ones that had the dream mortgaging our homes, taking loans, sometimes working for nothing to pay bills to achieve the American dream. As we near the anticipated court date sometime in March for our case I am asking everyone to make a contribution to BBNY. Our opposition is well funded and has no problem throwing money at this in an attempt to stop us. "This is about have skin in the game."

Frank DeCarlo, Executive Director
Businesses For A Better New York

Special Announcement - June 2009

I apologize for the lengthy delay in responding to our case that was heard in May of this year. Unfortunately, the request for discovery was denied for a number of reasons; The Equal protection, Interstate Commerce, and OSHA preemption was too open ended for the Second Circuit to rule favorably on. However, the stunner was this.

Our entire case was based on the fact that we believed labor law 240 violated our 14th Amendment rights. From the very first day we formed BBNY this went without saying, when I made my argument before the Second Circuit that we are denied Due Process in all 240 claims the courts decision was as follows:

"BBNY and Frank DeCarlo( pro se ) , in separate briefs, argued that the scaffold laws violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because their strict liability scheme precludes construction companies from raising certain defenses when faced with scaffold law claims. The due process claims were not stated in the complaint and were not considered by the magistrate judge;they were raised for the first time in the objections to the report and recommendations, and the the district court did not address them. Because we consider such issues "only when necessary to avoid manifest injustice, or where there is some extraordinary need," and because BBNY has not demonstrated manifest injustice or extraordinary need, we decline to consider them here."

The purpose of this case was exactly that! The Due Process violation, the other matters were collateral damage to the Due Process. The courts found a loophole and we lost the appeals but not the case!

Another suit has been filed and this one deals with only the Due Process violation. We are currently waiting for the service to officially take place in Albany, once that happens we will schedule a press release and secure a court date. While the other matters may be addressed I can assure you they will be only lightly addressed because the issue here the fact we are denied Due Process in 240 violations. Check our website for future information.